Grosvenor Casinos Loses $14 Million Claim
May 18 2012 - Friday

    Review Search



    Best Sportsbooks

Bet365
Bet365
Rating:9.3US Players NOT Accepted
Bodog
Bodog
Rating:8.6US Players NOT Accepted
Gamebookers
Gamebookers
Rating:8.5US Players NOT Accepted
Bovada
Bovada
Rating:8.3Accepts US Players
5Dimes
5Dimes
Rating:8.3Accepts US Players
    Top 10 Sportsbooks

    Best Casinos

CrazyVegasCasino
CrazyVegas
Rating:9.3US Players NOT Accepted
Bet365Casino
Bet365 Casino
Rating:9.2US Players NOT Accepted
SunVegas
SunVegas
Rating:8.7US Players NOT Accepted
GoldenRiviera
GoldenRiviera
Rating:8.7US Players NOT Accepted
RiverNileCasino
RiverNileCasino
Rating:8.6US Players NOT Accepted
    Top 10 Casinos

    News | Grosvenor Casinos Loses $14 Million Claim

In the UK, casino operator Grosvenor Casinos has lost its action against a bank for almost $14 million in unpaid cheques.

The operator owns the prestigious Clermont Club in London and took the National Bank of Abu Dhabi (NBAD) to court to recover monies owed by high-roller Ahmed Al-Reyaysa, a wealthy Middle-Eastern businessman who gambled almost $200 million and lost over $35 million in eight weeks beginning in December of 1999. Al-Reyaysa wrote two cheques for $6.09 million and $7.14 million from his NBAD account before losing the money playing roulette. His cheques later bounced and Grosvenor obtained a repayment order against him in court but could not enforce it as Al-Reyaysa is now beyond the jurisdiction of British courts in the United Arab Emirates.

The casino then filed charges against the bank claiming that an NBAD employee had told its bank, NatWest, that NBAD would honour the cheques. Grosvenor argued that NBAD was liable for the debt, as it had acted fraudulently.

“It seems to me inherently improbable that the NBAD employee was lying,” said Mr Justice Flaux in a statement.

“It is much more likely that he meant something slightly different from what the NatWest employee meant and understood.”

'This is an excellent outcome for NBAD and thoroughly deserved,” said Jonathan Kelly, Financial Litigation Partner for the legal firm representing NBAD, Simmons and Simmons.

“NBAD has vigorously defended itself since proceedings were first threatened by the casino in 2003. The bank’s robust approach has been vindicated.

“This is also an important result for international banking practice. Grosvenor’s claim that a contract existed between NBAD and the casino would have altered the ambit and effect of the rules for international cheque collections and left banks such as NBAD vulnerable to unintended contractual exposure to a range of third parties.”


Source: iGamingBusiness.com

Grosvenor Casinos Loses $14 Million Claim
Copyright © 2005 - 2012. 1stRating Co. (site map)
www.1stRating.com